Bassist
and composer Brad Cheeseman has released an EP of tender and intricate
contemporary jazz tunes called "Mixed Messages", which you can listen
to and/or buy here: http://bradcheeseman.bandcamp.com/
How
long have you been playing bass for? Was fusion an early love, or something you
developed a liking for as your talents grew into it?
I started playing bass in 2004, so roughly nine years now.
Jazz (and eventually fusion) was kind of an acquired taste for me. When I first
listened to bands like Weather Report and Return to Forever, it was the
musicianship that I was listening for; the language was beyond me. On the more
"traditional" side of things, Dave Brubeck's Time Out was
the first jazz record I bought, and it was the mixed meter compositions which I
was attracted to most, as they appealed to the inner progressive rock fan in
me. Since I could get a few of the elements in the music though, I kept
listening and gradually began to understand the music better.
Did
you start composing immediately, or did you feel like you should wait until
you'd developed a certain level of skill before writing your own music?
Composition has always been there to a certain extent but
it hasn't really been a major focus until the last few years. Rather than
waiting to develop a certain level of skill, I think it was more of a need to
make sense of who I am, musically speaking. I listen to a lot of different
music and I get to play a lot of different styles, but I wasn't sure if there
was a way to do all of it at once without it sounding like a total mess. Could
I have my cake and eat it, too? This was the challenge that really got me
going, so I started listening to music and asking myself why I liked it, or
what I found interesting in it, and the initial result of this process was what
would eventually become "Mixed Messages".
The
name of the EP fits the music very well, since I get contrasting moods from
these songs. For example, “Seven Sages” starts off as a rocking number—I think
of King Crimson—but the once the solos starts it gets soft, sentimental, and
slightly psychedelic. Were you intentionally contrasting moods, or was it a
result of synthesizing different musical styles? How would you describe the
atmosphere of Mixed Messages?
I think that I was mainly focused on creating interesting
arcs and telling complete stories with these songs, especially the bigger ones
like "Seven Sages" and "Mixed Messages". I remember an
interview with Esbjorn Svensson (of E.S.T.) who was talking about writing
"not just music to improvise on, but music that is music in its own
right" and that idea stuck with me and really informed the writing of this
material. I'm not really sure how I would describe the atmosphere of the
overall EP, though. What do you think?
It
depends on the song. "Mixed Messages" gives me the jazz feeling of
people who love music playing music they love, cerebral but groovy and
passionate. "Winter Solstice" feels nostalgic and sentimental.
"Seven Sages" and "Clouds" have the prog rock feeling of
going on a journey, a boat trip where the heroes are attacked by a cyclops,
showered with gifts, seduced by sirens, etc before making it home. (I just read
The Odyssey so that might've biased me.) For the EP as a whole the only thing
coming to mind is that it's thoughtful and brooding, as opposed to explosive
and extroverted.
I like that. The song-by-song approach definitely works a
bit better, as these were all written over a few years and were just some of
the songs I wanted to capture most with this group of musicians. That said, I
can't give enough credit to the other guys for helping me bring some life to
these songs. On paper, "Mixed Messages" probably borders on cold and
too intellectual but, well, your descriptors basically sum it up. I hadn't
really thought of "Winter Solstice" as intentionally nostalgic, but
that kind of makes sense as it's the oldest of the bunch. Rob's guitar solo
here really captures what I was going for, though, and Sam's interpretation is
wonderful. For the other songs, the Homer comparison is a good one, especially
for "Clouds".
Since you mentioned the Esbjorn Svensson quote, I'll ask you about the role of solos in your compositions. Do the songs ask for a certain instrument to be soloing in a certain place, or do you include them because improvisation is a big reason why people play and listen to jazz? Did you ask the other musicians to play in a certain way for a solo because that's what the song needed?
Regarding solos, I think it depends on the song. All of the
tunes that this group plays have solos but I don't think it would be out of the
question to do a completely through-composed piece of music with this group...
it just hasn't happened yet. Still, the solos in most of the songs that this
band plays are a part of the song's development, and not necessarily the
primary focus. As far as who solos on what, sometimes it's clear from the
beginning as to who's going to be featured (i.e. "Clouds" has always
been a guitar/sax feature). "Seven Sages" on the other hand, was
never meant to necessarily be a bass feature, but it's just kind of stuck (and
I wanted to have a good bass tune on the EP). Instead of asking people to solo
in a certain way to fit the music, I think it's more important to make sure
that the right people are playing on each tune. What tunes are going to bring
out the best of someone's playing? Who's going to connect with a song the best,
based on what I know of their playing and/or listening habits? Sometimes I
miss, or sometimes people ask to play (or sit out) on certain songs, but these
are all talented musicians and always surprise me with what they have to say on
their instruments.
How
would you define the Brad Cheeseman Group? How long have you been working with
the guys on Mixed Messages? (Is there a fixed "line-up"?)
Stylistically, I keep referring to the group as
contemporary jazz, which is kind of a catch-all term these days used to
describe any number of groups, but I like it better than "fusion". To
me, fusion has some connotations that I want to shy away from, like
self-indulgence and spectacle, whereas this has a bit more heart than fusion
might lead people to believe. On the other hand, it's a lot easier to just call
it fusion than to explain all of the above. It's definitely jazz to me, but I
think it has a lot to offer for people who aren't really fans of jazz.
The line-up has changed a bit since the first performances, and there's always a bit of a revolving door. Matt and Rob were the first to try out the charts, and Sam was there for the first real gig. Jeff first played with us shortly before tracking back in the fall, and Matt decided to pass the torch not too long after tracking was finished. It would be nice to always play with the same people, but the reality is that everyone's busy with work or their own projects and won't always be able to make the gig or commit to working on the material. As much as having subs can be difficult, though, it's exciting for me to hear new people play the tunes and interpret them differently.
The line-up has changed a bit since the first performances, and there's always a bit of a revolving door. Matt and Rob were the first to try out the charts, and Sam was there for the first real gig. Jeff first played with us shortly before tracking back in the fall, and Matt decided to pass the torch not too long after tracking was finished. It would be nice to always play with the same people, but the reality is that everyone's busy with work or their own projects and won't always be able to make the gig or commit to working on the material. As much as having subs can be difficult, though, it's exciting for me to hear new people play the tunes and interpret them differently.
Do you
see the group only playing your compositions, or could you see playing
standards, covers, or stuff by other members?
We've done a few covers here and there... I did an
arrangement of Brandt Brauer Frick's "Mi Corazon" which made pretty
regular setlist appearances for a while, and we did one-off performances of the
Pinball Number Count from Sesame Street and an different arrangement of
"Single Ladies". Since most of the performances we do are only one or
two sets, there hasn't really been a need for covers. However, we're doing a
festival in a few weeks where we need the extra material so we'll do a set of
standards. Earlier on when I was still getting some rep together I asked a
couple of the musicians to bring in tunes if they wanted, but nothing ever came
from it.
What are the plans for the group's future? Live shows?
Touring? More recordings?
I'm kind of playing it by ear. I really just want to keep
playing live and expanding whatever fan base we currently have, work on getting
the existing material together and start introducing some new tunes to the
repertoire. There are no plans to tour at the moment, but that would be a lot
of fun. It would just be a matter of getting the schedules of five people to
lineup for a long enough period of time, as well as making it a worthwhile
endeavour for everyone. As for more recording, eventually... it's definitely
not something that I want to rush into right now.
What’s
something you really love about Mixed Messages, and what’s something you'd like
to improve for next time?
Overall, I'm really glad everything turned out the way it
did. The production sounds great and everything has a good balance between
sounding produced and like a live band. My favourite moments are a lot of
little ones, especially regarding some of the solos. During the recording
sessions, I was so focused on bigger things like how the grooves felt, or
listening for major mistakes, that I missed how good some little moments really
were until we started listening back. Sometimes, things that seemed like
mistakes during the sessions actually end up being really cool moments that we
kept... probably something to do with conviction and people just going for it.
Live, it's not uncommon for songs to be stretched out for the solos, but in the studio we had to really try to keep things under control, which generally meant giving solos a set length. For the most part this worked but it would have been nice to let a few of the sections breathe a little more. Next time I'd try a slightly looser approach and make those calls on the fly.
Live, it's not uncommon for songs to be stretched out for the solos, but in the studio we had to really try to keep things under control, which generally meant giving solos a set length. For the most part this worked but it would have been nice to let a few of the sections breathe a little more. Next time I'd try a slightly looser approach and make those calls on the fly.
I know
it's hard to point to with words, but what's an example of a little favourite
moment?
One moment that sticks out is on the head out of
"Winter Solstice", Sam does this huge piano flourish. When he did it,
we all just kind of looked around the room at each other, as if to say
"you better believe that was the take". Also, the very end of Jeff's
solo on "Mixed Messages" was a bit of a surprise for everyone -- I could
see the producer and engineer cracking up in the control room. Everyone has
these moments scattered throughout, and I suppose it really comes down to how
much I enjoy listening to these guys play. We've played the songs a bunch in
rehearsal and on gigs, then after the tracking sessions I listened to the songs
over and over while choosing the best takes and listening to rough mixes, etc.
Which is to say that I know how the compositions sound and I have a general
idea about how the musicians play and improvise... yet I never get tired of
hearing them doing it and they always have new and interesting things to say on
their instruments.
Haha I
think I know the feeling when something surprising and awesome happens, and
when you finish and think "yeah that was great." Were any of the
songs particularly hard to get a good take? Was it hard to decide between
takes?
"Seven Sages" was the first one we did, and it
took the longest. In the end, I think we did seven takes (how fitting haha). It
was coming along and everything was always close. After the 5th take, we
switched gears and did one of the other ones, but I knew that we were close to
getting it so we went back and did a couple more and, sure enough, the last
take was the one. Sometimes, though, there are trade-offs where you can live
with one part if another part is really good. It's also really difficult to get
a sense of the overall picture while you're recording, because you're so
focused on what you're doing... it was always great to take a break and listen
back to what we were doing, or to get the perspective of the producer and/or
engineer.
That's
basically all the questions I had. I had fun. I hope you did too. Thanks a
bunch! Any last words? Favourite album of 2013?
I haven't gotten a chance to dig into too many 2013 albums
yet, but I've really been digging the new Justin Timberlake and James Blake
records. Lots of good music to check out, for sure! Thanks for doing this
interview. too. I hadn't really thought too intently about some of these
questions, so it was pretty informative for me. Lots of fun, thanks again!
No comments:
Post a Comment